Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 3:22:24 GMT -6
Unida and the Communist Party of Spain, together with the Forum of Left Lawyers, have filed a lawsuit before the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in Strasbourg, considering that the Spanish justice system has violated their rights by refusing to investigate the allegedly criminal actions committed by Juan Carlos de Borbón. The lawsuit argues the “opaque” nature of the actions of the Supreme Court and the Prosecutor's Office, which did not offer any results in the more than two years that passed without carrying out proceedings since they registered a complaint against the previous head of State in December 2018. This action did not deserve the protection of the Constitutional Court either, which was appealed to in 2021, thus exhausting the avenues for the Spanish justice system to investigate Juan Carlos de Borbón.
What gaps exist in the file of the case against the King Emeritus? IU and PCE have registered their claim before the European justice system within the period of six months set by the Court of Strasbourg from the last judicial action in the country of origin, in this case the non-admission of the amparo appeal by the Constitutional Court last October. , after the inaction of Costa Rica WhatsApp Number the Supreme Court against the king emeritus and other people in his closest friendship. The ECHR establishes the use of a standard form for plaintiffs to formalize their writings. Following this protocol, the form to explain the violations, the annex that details the reported events and all the documentation that accompanies it totals nearly 900 pages, all of this apart from the copies required in technical support. In addition to being promoted by Izquierda Unida, the Communist Party of Spain and the Forum of Left Lawyers, this action before European justice has the support of the formations that make up the political space of the Confederal Parliamentary.
Group of Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem -Galicia in Common. The debt of the Emeritus The plaintiffs consider that the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECDH), to which Spain is obliged, has been violated, since the Supreme Court "with a clear exculpatory spirit at all costs" filed the complaint without due diligence and the subsequent expansion registered. For Izquierda Unida and the PCE, the Supreme Court violated by filing their complaint articles 6.1 and 13.1 of the aforementioned European Convention, which refer to the fundamental right to a fair trial and effective judicial protection by an independent and impartial court. Among other reasons, they detail that effective judicial protection has not been respected because the actions of the Prosecutor's Office are “unrelated” to the judicial system, they correspond to a hierarchical institution and its development is “vetoed to the public” and does not allow any appearance. In relation to the arguments put forward by the Supreme Court to file the complaint filed and by the Prosecutor's Office to not investigate Juan Carlos de Borbón, the plaintiffs denounce before the Strasbourg Court that the Spanish justice system has granted him a kind of immunity to go unpunished before the commission of any crime , which goes against European legis.
What gaps exist in the file of the case against the King Emeritus? IU and PCE have registered their claim before the European justice system within the period of six months set by the Court of Strasbourg from the last judicial action in the country of origin, in this case the non-admission of the amparo appeal by the Constitutional Court last October. , after the inaction of Costa Rica WhatsApp Number the Supreme Court against the king emeritus and other people in his closest friendship. The ECHR establishes the use of a standard form for plaintiffs to formalize their writings. Following this protocol, the form to explain the violations, the annex that details the reported events and all the documentation that accompanies it totals nearly 900 pages, all of this apart from the copies required in technical support. In addition to being promoted by Izquierda Unida, the Communist Party of Spain and the Forum of Left Lawyers, this action before European justice has the support of the formations that make up the political space of the Confederal Parliamentary.
Group of Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem -Galicia in Common. The debt of the Emeritus The plaintiffs consider that the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECDH), to which Spain is obliged, has been violated, since the Supreme Court "with a clear exculpatory spirit at all costs" filed the complaint without due diligence and the subsequent expansion registered. For Izquierda Unida and the PCE, the Supreme Court violated by filing their complaint articles 6.1 and 13.1 of the aforementioned European Convention, which refer to the fundamental right to a fair trial and effective judicial protection by an independent and impartial court. Among other reasons, they detail that effective judicial protection has not been respected because the actions of the Prosecutor's Office are “unrelated” to the judicial system, they correspond to a hierarchical institution and its development is “vetoed to the public” and does not allow any appearance. In relation to the arguments put forward by the Supreme Court to file the complaint filed and by the Prosecutor's Office to not investigate Juan Carlos de Borbón, the plaintiffs denounce before the Strasbourg Court that the Spanish justice system has granted him a kind of immunity to go unpunished before the commission of any crime , which goes against European legis.